Subject: Re: [xsl] Is this about grouping ? From: Jeni Tennison <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 17:05:41 +0100 |
Hi Benoit, David's tackled the issue about you using following-sibling:: when you don't need to - you can just access the children of the relevant elements. > 2. the issues about indentation is shown in that result. I think for > better readability ,it would be much better if the result is as > follow : > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <topic> > <RqUID>ItemA</RqUID> > <SDR>ItemB</SDR> > <Contact> > <ContactLine> > <Detail> > <Name>111Alpha</Name> > <Reference>text3</Reference> > </Detail> > <Info>text4</Info> > <Detail> > <Name>111Alpha</Name> > <Reference>text3</Reference> > </Detail> > <Info>text4</Info> > <Detail> > <Name>111Alpha</Name> > <Reference>text3</Reference> > </Detail> > <Info>text4</Info> > </ContactLine> > </Contact> > </topic> I agree. Thankfully that kind of indentation is very easy to get with the xsl:output element: <xsl:output indent="yes" /> In the above, indentation follows the structure of the XML nesting. The issues with indentation in your previous posts were when you had indentation that didn't follow the nesting of the XML. Cheers, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Is this about grouping ?, Benoit_Aumars | Thread | RE: [xsl] Is this about grouping ?, Benoit_Aumars |
Re: [xsl] simple XPath question, Jeni Tennison | Date | RE: [xsl] Really basic, but can't g, Michael Kay |
Month |