Subject: Re: [xsl] RE: A simple solution (Was: Re: One for tomorrow :-) ) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 13:46:44 +0100 |
> So why isn't it working for me? Life's like that. > How can following-sibling::*[not(substring(.,string-length(.))=',')][4] not > return just the forth node, but all nodes? That can return at most one node. probably though you are not seeing what you think you're seeing. Post a small example (preferably without all that font stuff which is so upsetting:-) David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] RE: A simple solution (Wa, Daniel Newman | Thread | RE: [xsl] RE: A simple solution (Wa, Daniel Newman |
RE: [xsl] Empty nodes - more inform, Benoit_Aumars | Date | RE: [xsl] Empty nodes, Michael Kay |
Month |