Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0

Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0
From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:44:34 +0000
David C. wrote:
>> I might be reading it wrong, but I think that the << operator is
>> supposed to cover the combination of ancestor and preceding axes.
>> So if you did:
> more than that I think: document order orders nodes across documents
> (in an implementation way) whereas nodes in different documents are
> not comparable with orderings based on an axes.



Jeni Tennison

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread