Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: Re: An issue with XPath 2.0 sequences (Was Re: RE: Muenchian method, and keys 'n stuff) From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 10:27:56 -0000 |
> Also as Jeni pointed out the weird case of sequences changing their > cardinality when mapped by a function that may return the null > sequence... Or when mapped by any other function that doesn't preserve the cardinality of its input. A function that returns two items for every supplied item works in exactly the same way as a function that returns zero items for every supplied item: at least it's consistent! And it's also consistent with the behaviour of the "/" operator in path expressions, which I haven't heard anyone complain about. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: Re: An issue with XPath 2, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: Re: An issue with XPa, naha |
RE: [xsl] basic question about xpat, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Article: The Functional P, Graham Seaman |
Month |