Subject: RE: [xsl] XSL: For-Each Efficient or Not? From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 17:46:44 -0400 |
It's not that difficult. Saxon doesn't quite achieve this today but it will in the next release (I just tested it).
X[position() = 1 and name()='factorof']
can be statically rewritten as
X[1][name()='factorof']
Cheers, Wendell
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSL: For-Each Efficient o, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSL: For-Each Efficient o, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Practicality of Separatin, intelikon | Date | Re: [xsl] Practicality of Separatin, Robert S. Koberg |
Month |