Re: [xsl] processing-instruction()

[Joerg Heinicke <joerg.heinicke@xxxxxx>]

I read it and found David acknowedged, because the link to NodeTest 
(http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath#NT-NodeTest) states, that 
processing-instruction('Literal') is a NodeTest too.

So there is a sentence in XSLT spec saying
processing-instruction('Literal') has priority of 0

and a in the XPATH spec merged with the XSLT spec a sentence saying

processing-instruction('Literal') has priority of -0.5

What about node() and * - do they have the same priority?

Really strange ;-)

Joerg


Jeni Tennison wrote:
> David C. wrote:
>
> > Other than that it looks OK except
> >
> > <xsl:template match="node()">
> > and
> > <xsl:template match="processing-instruction('Eqn')">
> >
> > have the same default priority so you want to add priority="10" to
> > the processing-instruction ones.
>
>
> Actually, I think the processing-instruction('Eqn') matching template
> has a priority of 0 while the node() matching template has a priority
> of -0.5:
>
>   ...
>   * If the pattern has the form of a QName preceded by a
>     ChildOrAttributeAxisSpecifier *or has the form
>     processing-instruction(Literal)* preceded by a
>     ChildOrAttributeAxisSpecifier, then the priority is 0.
>   ...
>   * Otherwise, if the pattern consists of just a NodeTest preceded
>     by a ChildOrAttributeAxisSpecifier, then the priority is -0.5.
>   ...
>                       http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#conflict (my emphasis)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeni
>
> ---
> Jeni Tennison
> http://www.jenitennison.com/
>
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


--

System Development
VIRBUS AG
Fon  +49(0)341-979-7419
Fax  +49(0)341-979-7409
joerg.heinicke@xxxxxxxxx
www.virbus.de


XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list