Subject: Re: [xsl] HTML <script> tag From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 12:30:41 +0100 |
> Is it really A Bad Thing to have <foo></foo> instead of <foo/>? At least > until clients catch up anyway... most html clients will give you two line breaks for <br /></br> and just one for <br /> (which is what you want) so fudging things so that the html will sneak past the html parsers of legacy browsers isn't as simple as just not using /> syntax you have to special case each element. Of course its even worse if yo use a <script> element that has content as then you have to somehow try to make & and < be correct in both html (where they must not be quoted) and xhtml (where they must be quoted) David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] HTML <script> tag, Andrew Welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] HTML <script> tag, Mike Brown |
[xsl] another quest, Alia Mikati | Date | RE: [xsl] another quest, Jarno . Elovirta |
Month |