RE: [xsl] tag minimisation

Subject: RE: [xsl] tag minimisation
From: "Américo Albuquerque" <aalbuquerque@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 17:32:17 +0100
Hi.

The following elements don't 'inherit' the style, they are simply put
'inside' the <div/> element

So, to a web browser
<div style="font-weight:bold"/>
<div>foo</div>
is the same as
<div style="font-weight:bold">
 <div>foo</div>
</div>

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andrew Welch
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 4:27 PM
To: Xsl-List (E-mail)
Subject: [xsl] tag minimisation


When elements like <div></div> get minimised by the processor to <div/>
it's *really* frustrating.

I cannot stress how annoying it is to find that because you have an
element in your data that is empty, you get a minimised ouput element
where all following elements 'inherit' the style...

For example:

<div style="font-weight:bold"/>
<div>foo</div>

will give you a bold 'foo'.

I appreciate that html/css is at fault, but surely its easy to add a
minimisation='no' extension until browsers catch up...?  That or
continue the advice of 'add a space to the end of the element to prevent
it getting minimised'...

At the moment I can see no real benefit of enforcing minimisation.

cheers
andrew

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.385 / Virus Database: 217 - Release Date: 04/09/2002


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread