Subject: Re: [xsl] a nicer total sibling count than this From: "Stewart C. Russell" <scruss@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 22:25:44 -0400 |
Using position() and last() will often be more efficient than using count() and xsl:number, because they work on the current node list, which you are using anyway to output the nodes.
cheers, Stewart
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] a nicer total sibling cou, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] a nicer total sibling cou, Wendell Piez |
Re: [xsl] Problem using MSXML, Mike Brown | Date | Re: [xsl] replace < and > wit, Ming Yu |
Month |