Subject: RE: [xsl] XML in IE6 From: "bryan" <bry@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:00:51 +0200 |
CORRECTION I SAID: > one thing I notice is that while it >is still wd-xsl it is not the same stylesheet that it was some years >ago(much shorter, use of namespace declarations, use of Microsoft >datatype extensions). This indicates that someone at Microsoft is still >using wd-xsl enough to improve at coding it. Looking through my old (edited)copy of DEFAULTSS.xsl and comparing them with the one here I realized that the only thing which actually seems to have been changed was the namespace prefix for wd-xsl to x: The reason why I was thinking it seemed shorter was that in my edited version I'd played around with the css to give the script/css areas of the stylesheet a more readable display, with the side effect that the whole stylesheet seemed "bigger". XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XML in IE6, bryan | Thread | RE: [xsl] XML in IE6, Mike Ferrando |
RE: [xsl] XML in IE6, bryan | Date | [xsl] newbie question: transforming, milena schrevel |
Month |