Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 13:38:40 -0600 |
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 05:54:22PM -0800, W. Eliot Kimber wrote:
Yes--on the EXSLFO list I've discussed several possible low-cost solutions to this limitation,
Do you mean the FOP-dev list or something else? If something else, can you give subscription information? Google doesn't seem to know about it.
Eliot -- W. Eliot Kimber, eliot@xxxxxxxxxx Consultant, ISOGEN International
1016 La Posada Dr., Suite 240 Austin, TX 78752 Phone: 512.656.4139
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript, Zack Brown | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript, David Tolpin |
RE: [xsl] Re: Different Namespace P, Jeffrey Winter | Date | Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript, David Tolpin |
Month |