Subject: Re: [xsl] preceding sibling headaches From: Paul Tremblay <phthenry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 21:48:04 -0400 |
Thanks. Both methods worked. I understand the name function (at least now), but how does this line work: "preceding-sibling::*[1]/self::transition" I get from this: (1) Look at the preceeding-sibling axis (2) Look at any node in the preceeding-siblings (3) Look at the previous node But I am a bit confused by the syntax after the "/". I thought that once you used a predicate ([1]), you couldn't go any further in detail. (This is what baffled me.) Thanks Paul On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 08:40:49AM +1200, Conal Tuohy wrote: > > > Paul, > > try changing the test to this: > > <xsl:when test = "name(preceding-sibling::*[1])='transition'"> > > Or "preceding-sibling::*[1]/self::transition" which also means "the first > preceding-sibling node, if it is a transition", without requiring the > "name()" function-call. > > > I think the way you have it now simply returns the first previous > > occurrence of a 'transition' element rather than testing to > > see if the > > immediately previous element is a 'transition' element. > > agree. > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list -- ************************ *Paul Tremblay * *phthenry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx* ************************ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] FOP conversion font problems, Mike Ferrando | Thread | RE: [xsl] preceding sibling headach, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] concatenated key, I-Lin Kuo | Date | [xsl] xsl:copy-of O.K. on RTF, but , William Reilly |
Month |