Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT In the Build Process? From: Mitch Amiano <mitch.amiano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 09:06:58 -0400 |
Mitch Amiano wrote at 9 May 2003 15:54:20 -0400: > I've observed a team of developers using XSLT as a build tool to > generate C++ code, instead of using the UML tool that had been > selected for them (Rhapsody). They modelled various aspects of the > problem domain using XML, and used XSLT templates to pump out C++. ... > How common is this approach? Anyone else have experience long-term > applying a similar approach?
Much of the C code for the Sun xmlroff XSL formatter [1] is generated from the XML for the XSL 1.0 Recommendation.
If I may speak for Dave Pawson, the appendices in his XSL FO book are also generated from the XML for the XSL 1.0 Recommendation.
Regards,
Tony Graham ------------------------------------------------------------------------ XML Technology Center - Dublin Sun Microsystems Ireland Ltd Phone: +353 1 8199708 Hamilton House, East Point Business Park, Dublin 3 x(70)19708
[1] http://xmlroff.sourceforge.net/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT In the Build Process, G. Ken Holman | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT In the Build Process, Mike Haarman |
RE: [xsl] Comparison of XSL and XSL, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT In the Build Process, Mitch Amiano |
Month |