Subject: Re: [xsl] literal result elements vs. <xsl:element> From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 13:11:01 -0400 |
can someone please explain what the difference is between using literal result elements and using <xsl:element>, and what pros and cons exist?
I have been using <xsl:element>, b/c it had seemed the more correct somehow, but from what I'm reading on literal result elements, they should work just as well, and they even offer the advantage of being able categorically to use attribute value templates. (-and they're in the book, so that means they're legitimate.;) ).
Cheers, Wendell
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] literal result elements v, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] literal result elements v, Abie Hamaoui |
Re: [xsl] pesky xmlns attributes, Wendell Piez | Date | RE: [xsl] A way to use Single quote, Benjamin Farrow |
Month |