Subject: RE: [xsl] What's the fastest XSL-FO renderer out there... From: David.Pawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 09:44:29 +0100 |
> Hammer.xml+Hammer.xsl --> Hammer.PDF > (Hammer.xml and Hammer.xsl is distributed from RenderX site). Surely a better, more direct comparison would only include the .fo file to pdf? I.e. only time the formatter. You should not compare two different xslt engines, especially when we know that they can produce quite different results? Regards DaveP - DISCLAIMER: NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it and any attachments from your system. RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Notes on Comparison of XS, Tokushige Kobayashi | Thread | [xsl] variable visibility, belangour abdessamad |
[xsl] Design question, John Bell | Date | AW: [xsl] firing on more than one m, Ronald Kent Gibson |
Month |