Subject: Re: [xsl] Getting a distinct list of node names From: David Tolpin <dvd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 00:15:52 +0400 (AMT) |
> > > node:definition/*[not(name() = name(preceding-sibling::*))] > > > >Why should this take a long time? Isn't this the same as > > > >*[not(name() = name(preceding-sibling::*[last()]))] > > preceding-sibling::*[last()]), which therefore won't de-duplicate properly. > > So it won't take a long time, and it won't work either. But is there a way to express it as a single predicate? I mean, not equal to the name of any preceding-sibling? Just out of curiousity. David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Getting a distinct list o, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [xsl] Getting a distinct list o, Wendell Piez |
Re: [xsl] Generating XML fragment t, Steve Dussinger | Date | Re: [xsl] Getting a distinct list o, Wendell Piez |
Month |