Subject: Re: [xsl] Getting a distinct list of node names From: David Tolpin <dvd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 04:53:50 +0400 (AMT) |
> In fact, it's the first step in the oft-recommended Muenchian grouping > technique. (De-duplicate nodes by grouping criterion, then group by the set > of de-duplicated "flag-bearer" nodes.) > > A common way to do this is simply to compare a node's value to other nodes > (here it's the value of the node's name that you care about): > > node:definition/*[not(name() = name(preceding-sibling::*))] > Why should this take a long time? Isn't this the same as *[not(name() = name(preceding-sibling::*[last()]))] David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Getting a distinct list o, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [xsl] Getting a distinct list o, Wendell Piez |
RE: [xsl] Formatting XSL-FO Based o, Andreas L. Delmelle | Date | Re: [xsl] Getting a distinct list o, G. Ken Holman |
Month |