Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath is NOT a functional language From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:54:23 +0100 |
Note this is the wrong list really; if you want to change the draft, post a comment to public-qt-comments@xxxxxx however: I fail to see the relevance. Whether or not the host language is functional, XPath is not. And I don't see the point of saying it is. I doubt that it was a particularly conscious decision to make that statement for Xpath. XPath and Xquery have shared source files and the Xquery version of the paragraph makes better reading, you could just ask them to mark the whole sentence as xquery only. David -- http://www.dcarlisle.demon.co.uk/matthew ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XPath is NOT a functional, Colin Paul Adams | Thread | Re: [xsl] XPath is NOT a functional, Colin Paul Adams |
Re: [xsl] Re Numbering, Wendell Piez | Date | Re: [xsl] template matching, passin, Wendell Piez |
Month |