Re: [xsl] killing xslt

I think everyone is being too pessimistic on the subject of XSLT 2.0. In a previous lifetime, when I was Chairman of the OASIS XSLT Conformance Committee, I was aware of at least 4 XSLT 2.0 development projects or announced betas. So, even if Microsoft won't have one right away, there will be XSLT 2.0 processors available. And, some (but not all ;-) of the new features will draw users and more support as time goes on. XSLT 1.0 didn't take off overnight either, but it grew as folks discovered its uses.

--

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
=    Jeff Kenton      Consulting and software development               =
=                     http://home.comcast.net/~jeffrey.kenton           =
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] killing xslt, (continued) Oleg Tkachenko - Thu, 13 May 2004 18:18:34 +0200 Brian Grainger - Thu, 13 May 2004 22:02:18 -0600 Oleg Tkachenko - Fri, 14 May 2004 09:28:45 +0200 Elliotte Rusty Harold - Fri, 14 May 2004 07:24:45 -0400 Jeff Kenton - Fri, 14 May 2004 08:02:00 -0400 <= M. David Peterson - Fri, 14 May 2004 07:15:23 -0600 Kenny Akridge - Fri, 14 May 2004 09:35:13 -0400 Colin Paul Adams - 14 May 2004 05:26:54 +0100 M. David Peterson - Fri, 14 May 2004 01:39:49 -0600

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] killing xslt, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] killing xslt, Elliotte Rusty Harol	Thread	RE: [xsl] killing xslt, M. David Peterson
Re: [xsl] killing xslt, Elliotte Rusty Harol	Date	RE: [xsl] killing xslt, Michael Kay
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home