Subject: Re: [xsl] Large transforms (was Re: [xsl] GByte Transforms) From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 16:16:02 -0400 |
I have to say I was a little disappointed/puzzled by the lack of responses. I am not sure why this was but I can only assume there is either little interest in transforms over the few 100MB size or little interest in discussing the problems this presents.
It is not often I get the chance to discuss stuff we are doing on the processor for obvious commercial reasons. I thought this subject might be suitable for a wider audience as anecdotal evidence suggests that large XML file usage is growing and and along with that comes some expectation that tools can cope.
Cheers, Wendell
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Large transforms (was Re: [xsl] GBy, Kevin Jones | Thread | RE: [xsl] Large transforms (was Re:, Michael Kay |
Large transforms (was Re: [xsl] GBy, Kevin Jones | Date | RE: [xsl] parameters - element vs a, stephen . peterson |
Month |