Subject: RE: [xsl] Large transforms (was Re: [xsl] GByte Transforms) From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 23:12:49 +0100 |
> I have to say I was a little disappointed/puzzled by the lack > of responses. I suspect you are right in suggesting that the number of people doing transforms over 100Mb is quite small. My reaction to your post was that I would like to know more about your technology. But since your web site seems to go out of its way to avoid giving anything away, and your posting did much the same, I thought it was probably futile to ask. I find it difficult to take the marketing claims for your product seriously in the absence of solid technical information that we can have a discussion about. Sorry if that's unfair, but you asked why we/I didn't react, and that's the reason. Michael Kay
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Large transforms (was Re:, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [xsl] Large transforms (was Re:, Brian Chrisman |
RE: [xsl] Parsing a string, Michael Kay | Date | XSLT help to generate FO-page-seque, Kenny Bogoe (BogoeMD |
Month |