RE: [xsl] Large transforms (was Re: [xsl] GByte Transforms)

Subject: RE: [xsl] Large transforms (was Re: [xsl] GByte Transforms)
From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 23:12:49 +0100
> I have to say I was a little disappointed/puzzled by the lack 
> of responses. 

I suspect you are right in suggesting that the number of people doing
transforms over 100Mb is quite small.

My reaction to your post was that I would like to know more about your
technology. But since your web site seems to go out of its way to avoid
giving anything away, and your posting did much the same, I thought it was
probably futile to ask. I find it difficult to take the marketing claims for
your product seriously in the absence of solid technical information that we
can have a discussion about. Sorry if that's unfair, but you asked why we/I
didn't react, and that's the reason.

Michael Kay

Current Thread