Subject: Re: [xsl] Javascript in Xsl using-Xalan-Problem From: bry@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 19:40:19 +0200 |
> I have to say that > I can't imagine why people insist in doing this, they almost invariably > shoot themself in the foot at first. > Actually I think it can be seductive for one thing, which is to use xslts model for progressing through an xml document in situations where one has to build interpreters for the a document, stuff like CIM operations over http. An argument against it would be to output javascript and eval() that but I am not sure about how that compares with internal evaluation. for example Cim over http -> url -> call xslt -> eval output -> build cim response -> send response CIM over http -> url -> call xslt -> eval parts of tree, build response -> send response. At the same time it seems like a seductive model it also seems totally wrong-headed, but then again I have had successes in various instances following the wrong-headed path.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Javascript in Xsl using-X, J.Pietschmann | Thread | Re: [xsl] Javascript in Xsl using-X, Barry Lay |
Re: [xsl] Javascript in Xsl using-X, J.Pietschmann | Date | RE: [xsl] Javascript in Xsl using-X, Michael Kay |
Month |