Subject: Re: [xsl] Stumped on why a field isn't showing up From: Deirdre Saoirse Moen <deirdre@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 15:37:25 -0700 |
It's funny how obvious things get overlooked. And in this case not just
overlooked but I flat out didn't even realize what I was looking at at
first because it's been so long since I've played with linking external
references with entity references. I REALLY am missing my morning cup
of coffee. Starbucks may very be a mandatory excursion for me at the
moment! :)
Well, for 3 days you're doing well so be encouraged by that. Actually, you would be surprised at just how easy it is to make the changes but the other thing that I didn't mention in my last email that I should have is that on the flipside of performance is practicality, reality, and the fact then when you're using it for a one off transformation performance may not be as much of an issue when transforming small files.
If you do find yourself with the need to continue development in XSL-FO or XSLT I do encourage you to do some quick research as you will be greatly encouraged when you find out just how much is possible with these technologies.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Stumped on why a field is, M. David Peterson | Thread | transformation help, Marcus B. Irven |
RE: [xsl] Stumped on why a field is, M. David Peterson | Date | RE: [xsl] transformation help, Michael Kay |
Month |