RE: [xsl] XSL resources - Flat to hierarchy - Common ancestors

Subject: RE: [xsl] XSL resources - Flat to hierarchy - Common ancestors
From: "Ben Simkins" <bsimkins@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:48:09 +0200
Not wishing to quit on a winning streak...
> > 3. Given the hierarchical output from 2, I would like to extract all
> > nodes which are children of any of the ancestors of the node with a
> > given MenuId (including that node itself)
> > Expressed otherwise: the children, siblings, ancestors, uncles and
> > great-uncles, great-great-uncles (etc) of the given node.
> > Expressed otherwise: all Menus where MenuParentId IN (MenuIds of a
given
> > node and all of its ancestors)
>
> <xsl:template match="/Menus">
> 	<xsl:apply-templates select="Menu"/>
> </xsl:template>
>
> <xsl:template match="Menu">
> <xsl:variable name="MenuId" select="@MenuId"/>
> 	<xsl:apply-templates select="ancestor-or-self::Menu[@MenuId =
> $MenuId]"
> mode="MenuId">
> 		<xsl:with-param name="MenuId" select="$MenuId" />
> 	</xsl:apply-templates>
> </xsl:template>
>
> <xsl:template match="Menu" mode="MenuId">
> <xsl:param name="MenuId"/>
> ... output what you want here ...
> <xsl:apply-templates select="*[@MenuId = $MenuId]" mode="MenuId">
> 	<xsl:with-param name="MenuId" select="$MenuId"/>
> </xsl:apply-templates>
> </xsl:template>
>
> Untested, but this is the general idea...
What do the variable and the parameter do?

Wouldn't <xsl:with-param name="MenuId" select="@MenuId" /> also work in
the first "Menu" template ?

I take it this isn't the same as a parameter which would be passed in on
a query string (or whatever the xsl equivalent is)?
What I want to be able to do is to pass a MenuId to the xsl and have it
collapse everything except the branch on which that Menu is (in case
anyone wondered, the target use is for a frameless web site with 400+
menus, where I don't want to display all 400 menus on every click, and
where I don't want to loop through them on every click either)

Is that what this example does?

->If it isn't clear what I mean by 'collapse everything but', I'll send
an example

Current Thread