Subject: RE: Re[2]: [xsl] Transformation using Saxon.Net-1.0-RC1 From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:15:49 +0100 |
I'd suggest using the saxon-help list. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: M. David Peterson [mailto:m.david.x2x2x@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 01 April 2005 09:54 > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Re[2]: [xsl] Transformation using Saxon.Net-1.0-RC1 > > Hi Dr Kay, > > Is this the appropriate place to ask questions regarding this or > should I ask them on the Saxon-Help list? > > On a side note I too was very excited to hear that Dimitre in turn was > pleased with the performance and common functionality and now this > excitement has tripled to hear that you are pleased by this. Again, > there are many others (including you) who deserve praise for this and > I am simply pleased to be evan a small part of bringing this first > release to the community, looking forward to much more to come. There > is so much more that can be done and I am completely convinced that by > engaging the community far more will be accomplished than if this were > to not take place. And to give credit again where credit is due I > believe that it was through the encouragement and focus that Dimitre > gave to me and this project that has ultimately brought us to this > point, ready to move forward with much excitement and anticipation. > > I will await your response as to where I should post these questions. > I wonder if even the Wiki would be a good place as it will keep the > conversations in a central place that can be added to as time permits > as well as by others who may decide to become involved in various > ways. Thoughts? > > On Apr 1, 2005 1:18 AM, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > What I'd be glad to have in the near future is the > ability to pass to > > > the transformation extension objects, written in native > .NET languages > > > like C#. AFAIK M.D.Peterson is working on this and I am > confident he > > > will have good results soon. > > > > The extension mechanisms in Saxon are now highly > configurable: you can plug > > in "extension binders" that implement their own rules for binding to > > external functions, either alongside or instead of the > default mechanism. So > > it should be possible to do this in a very clean way. > > > > I'm pleased to hear positive news about Saxon.NET from a > demanding user. > > > > Michael Kay > > http://www.saxonica.com/ > > > > > > > -- > <M:D/> > > :: M. David Peterson :: > XML & XML Transformations, C#, .NET, and Functional Languages > Specialist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Re[2]: [xsl] Transformation usi, M. David Peterson | Thread | Re[4]: [xsl] Transformation using S, Arthur Maloney |
RE: [xsl] (newby) define an attribu, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] (newby) extraction of CDA, David Carlisle |
Month |