Subject: Re: [xsl] disable-output-escaping for attributes From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 00:51:11 +0100 |
> Maybe I didn't get whole picture about character maps but they seem > overly complicated in contrast to "just" use DOE (expecially because > input and output will look very different) character maps are more flexible but the simple case of emulating d-o-e doesn't really involve much extra syntax over the d-o-e method. See for-example the posting: http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/200503/msg00585.html I suggest in a followup that this be wrapped in an xsl:function David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] disable-output-escaping f, Victor | Thread | [xsl] XSL-List Guidelines, Mulberry Technologie |
Re: [xsl] xsl:number and conditiona, Bruce D'Arcus | Date | [xsl] Frustrated with xxx:node-set, Karl Stubsjoen |
Month |