Subject: RE: [xsl] Another supported langauge From: "Alan Boldock" <aboldock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 14:43:38 +0930 |
Thanks Jano, Tried that and although it was being skipped by the formatter my other process (A SAX Parser) coulodn't see the <?provider 1234567890?> tag. Any other ideas? Thanks Alan -----Original Message----- From: Jarno.Elovirta@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:Jarno.Elovirta@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, 6 June 2006 3:13 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [xsl] Another supported langauge Hi, ><fo:root xmlns:fo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format"> ><provider>123456789012345678</provider> ><fo:layout-master-set> >... >Now it still generates the PDF but is there a better/proper >way of being able to pass the extra data I need in provider >without causing the error. I now it's not in the FO namespace >but I need another process to grab the XML and do something >else with it but FOP still has to be able to produce the PDF >with the same file. How about a processing instruction <?provider 123456789012345678?>? Jarno
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Another supported langaug, Jarno.Elovirta | Thread | RE: [xsl] Another supported langaug, Jarno.Elovirta |
Re: [xsl] Generating multi-level fl, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] url encoding gets wrong w, Niklas Holmberg |
Month |