Subject: Re: [xsl] Getting the Base Character of Character with Diacritic From: "Colin Adams" <colinpauladams@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 09:12:19 +0100 |
From: Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx>
Colin Adams wrote:as the C forms consist of de-composition followed by composition. So it would be strange to implement NFC, and not implement NFD.
I see. I never looked at it that way. I always thought that de-composition was the hard way, and never realized that you actually needed to de-compose before you can compose. But come to think of it, it sounds rather logical.
Hmm, that sounds counter-intuitive towards the fact that the W3C committee for XPath decided that only NFC be mandatory. In other words: it sounds kind only to make one normalization form mandatory, but in fact they impose both NFD and NFC, so why not make both mandatory anyway?
-- Abel
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Getting the Base Characte, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] Getting the Base Characte, Michael Kay |
[xsl] apply template to XSL text co, Dharshana S Van Der | Date | Re: [xsl] apply template to XSL tex, James Fuller |
Month |