Subject: Re: [xsl] Tutorial for collection() From: "Jesper Tverskov" <jesper@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 19:35:57 +0200 |
First, I think that your statement that we have only 2 major XSLT 2.0 processors is incorrect. I fail to see how Gestalt is less major than Altova.
In gestalt, the collection function currently only accepts a file: URI which must be a legitimate file URI pointing to a directory. All files in this directory that sucessfully parse as xml create a document node in the directory.
If your proper documentation for Gestalt has something of interest for the collection() function, I will link to it.
Secondly, it would be better in your example to change the template with match="/" to one with name="initial". Asking the user to supply a dummy document is senseless.
As far as I know name="initial" is only a method some processors support and only from the command line or from other code. When testing, many people just use an XML Editor?
Jesper Tverskov http://www.xmlplease.com/xslt
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Tutorial for collection(), David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Tutorial for collection(), Colin Paul Adams |
Re: [xsl] Tutorial for collection(), David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] XML Prague 2007 June 16th & 1, James Fuller |
Month |