Subject: RE: [xsl] Add numbers From: "Scott Trenda" <Scott.Trenda@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:41:53 -0500 |
Point taken and noted. Unfortunately, at my work, we're stuck using XSLT 1.0 until Microsoft gets around to releasing their implementation of XSLT 2.0, and probably not even until some time after that. I'm holding off on using XSLT 2.0 at all until then, because I'm pretty sure I'm going to like it way too much. :P ~ Scott -----Original Message----- From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 11:39 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] Add numbers > The [1] is actually redundant, as generate-id() will only take the first > node returned. This is true in XSLT1 but putting it in anyway is a good idea as it makes it a bit more explicit and more importantly it keeps the code working if you ever upgrade the stylesheet to XSLT2 (where passing multiple values to string functions is an error unless backward compatibility mode is in force) David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Add numbers, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] Add numbers, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Add numbers, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] Add numbers, Michael Kay |
Month |