Subject: RE: [xsl] Add numbers From: "Chaudhary, Harsh" <HCHAUDHA@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:46:51 -0500 |
I agree to that. I stuck with the [1] in my code. Harsh. -----Original Message----- From: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 11:42 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [xsl] Add numbers > In your Muenchian grouping condition: > generate-id() = generate-id(key('x', @key)[1]) The [1] > is actually redundant, as generate-id() will only take the > first node returned. So you can use this: > generate-id() = generate-id(key('x', @key)) I would recommend using the "[1]", because then your code won't throw an error when the stylesheet is upgraded to version="2.0". Also, I think it's good generally not to rely on the implicit discarding of items in a sequence after the first, simply because it makes your code clearer to make it explicit. Michael Kay
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Add numbers, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Add numbers, David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] Add numbers, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Add numbers, David Carlisle |
Month |