Re: [xsl] Difference in priority of node() and *

Subject: Re: [xsl] Difference in priority of node() and *
From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:04:57 +0530
Thanks David for interesting perspective. Kindly see my few remarks below ...

On Feb 16, 2008 6:46 PM, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> foo[x=1] is clearly more specific than foo[x &gt; 0] but they have the same
> default priority. node() and * having the same priority is no different.

foo[x=1] and foo[x &gt; 0] are semantically same. I certainly think,
that default priority of these patterns should be same. = and &gt; are
two relational operators, and I think, that this fact makes the
default priority of these two patterns same.

To my opinion, the case of * and node() is a bit different than the
foo[.. example you gave.

But certainly, the world is safe, and can live with the current status
of default priorities. And I won't argue much about it.


-- 
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi

Current Thread