Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 in a web browser|
From: "Colin Adams" <colinpauladams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 07:39:50 +0000
On 25/03/2008, bryan rasmussen <rasmussen.bryan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Is there some reason why Gestalt would be easily transferable to Firefox I forsee no problems. > I supposed that being implemented in Eiffel it would be more > problematic than a java based one? Less so, I would have thought. Since there is no virtual machine involved, there is no worries about which version of the JVM is implemented in Firefox. I intend to write a C wrapper to the Gestalt API. This will then be usable from PHP, Python, Ruby etc. Then all I need to do for Firefox is to implement the C++ class and forward calls to the C wrapper. > Of course if there was a java applet version of Saxon it would be a snap. I don't think so. You would need to call the applet from the C++ class. It would seem more sensible to me to call the Saxon API directly via JNI.