Subject: Re: [xsl] Descendant::?? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:16:06 +0100 |
The version i posted using apply-templates woul dnaturally have dealt with nested categories to arbitrary depth, even though you said you didn't need that initially. The paths to some of teh fields probably needed some small tweaks but that should have been easy to fix. Using for-each here you limit yourself to just two levels. <a href="{descendant::link}"> <img src="{descendant::image}"/> If there are nested categories (or even if there are not) it seems likely that descentant axis here may pick up more than one link or inage element. While you are using xslt1 all but teh first will be silently discarded (which may be what you want) but if you switch to xslt2 you will get all the link values, spae speparated so neither the link nor the image will work. David
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Descendant::??, Dan Acuff | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSL-T should naturally lo, Dan Acuff |
Re: [xsl] MSXML 6 and XSLT 2.0, Liam Quin | Date | [xsl] named template with parameter, Ilya Lifshits |
Month |