Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt architecture From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 11:43:38 +0200 |
I think the question of which processor is involved also can add in some overhead. For example I seem to remember that MSXML used to open everything as a new DOM. This however was quite a while ago so not sure if it has been changed since. Cheers, Bryan Rasmussen On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From a processor's perspective: is there any difference between one > stylesheet containing 100 templates and 100 stylesheets each > containing 1 template each, with an extra stylesheet containing 100 > include statements? > > Import precedence issues aside, if they were 100 imports instead of > includes, does that make a significant difference to the processor? > (all unique files imported once, not the same file imported in > multiple locations) > > I tend towards monolith stylesheets where there's usually no more than > a dozen or so large stylesheets, but in front of me now is the > complete opposite approach and I'm not keen... > > -- > Andrew Welch > http://andrewjwelch.com > Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xslt architecture, Colin Adams | Thread | RE: [xsl] xslt architecture, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] xslt architecture, Colin Adams | Date | [xsl] Upgrading from server side MS, Andrew Welch |
Month |