Subject: Re: [xsl] the future of xslt From: "Philip Fearon" <pgfearo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 08:49:36 +0100 |
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 11:14 PM, M. David Peterson <m.david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:55:40 -0600, bryan rasmussen > <rasmussen.bryan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> http://www.google.com/trends?q=xslt%2C+xsl%2C+xml+stylesheet&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0 > > Who would actually search for the term "xml stylesheet"? This is a > meaningless comparison. The term "xml stylesheet" was just thrown in (along with "xsl" which is more significant) as one example of the possible variations in a search for "xslt". It was not intended for comparison on its own. So yes, it turns out that this example is of little significance, but not meaningless in my view. Variations should still be checked out. Phil Fearon
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] the future of xslt, Elliotte Harold | Thread | Re: [xsl] the future of xslt, M. David Peterson |
[no subject], Unknown | Date | Re: [xsl] the future of xslt, Andrew Welch |
Month |