Subject: Re: [xsl] the future of xslt From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:29:03 +0100 |
> Can anyone explain the dominance of Czech in the languages and India in the > locations? It doesn't seem to make sense. India makes sense - practically every project has an outsourced component because: a) management have no idea about complexities of writing software and think once it's been designed anyone can code it b) perceived cost savings There was a similar move a few years ago to shift call centers to India, which has now been proven to have failed because they are moving them back again (here in the UK they're advertising "UK based call centers" as some sort of benefit of the product). If a basic support line has failed, why would anyone think developing software in this way would work? -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] the future of xslt, M. David Peterson | Thread | Re: [xsl] the future of xslt, bryan rasmussen |
Re: [xsl] the future of xslt, Philip Fearon | Date | Re: [xsl] Grouping a List into A Gr, Florent Georges |
Month |