Subject: Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:27:29 -0700 |
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Alexander Johannesen <alexander.johannesen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 21:58, John Snelson <john.snelson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Maybe you've heard of a language called XSLT? Or XQuery? :-) > > Cheap shot. :) Besides, I meant real programming languages, not a faux > functional LISP wannabe in XML guise, with no OO, so there! Warning: you are starting a big flame here: XML *is* a real programming language as are Haskell, Lisp, OCaml, F#, ..., etc. Isn't there anything in the world beyond OO? :) -- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- Never fight an inanimate object ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play > > > Alex > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Project Wrangler, SOA, Information Alchemist, UX, RESTafarian, Topic Maps > ------------------------------------------ http://shelter.nu/blog/ --------
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Alexander Johannesen | Thread | Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] test context node existen, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |