Subject: Re: [xsl] Still thinking to object oriented... From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 10:31:41 +0100 |
ahh ok, if you just want the attributes' names then do: select="//*[descendant-or-self::*[contains(name(),'to_search')]]/(name(), @*/name())" you might prefer to not use a one-liner now, to make it clearer eg: <xsl:for-each select="//*[descendant-or-self::*[contains(name(),'to_search')]]"> <xsl:value-of select="concat(name(), '&_#xa;')"/> <xsl:for-each select="@*"> <xsl:value-of select="concat(' ', name(), '&_#xa;')"/> ... etc 2008/10/9 Jonas Bassl <Jonas@xxxxxxxx>: > Thank you, > but i am getting this error: > > Cannot mix nodes and atomic values in the result of a path expression > URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/#ERRXPTY0018 > > Jonas > > 2008/10/9 Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx>: >>> now since i was working with the solution i got from here, i am stuck >>> with the following problem: >>> >>> <xsl:template match="/"> >>> <xsl:value-of >>> select="//*[descendant-or-self::*[contains(name(),'to_search')]]/name()" >>> separator=" "/> >>> </xsl:template> >>> </xsl:stylesheet> >>> >>> This stylesheet only gives me the name of the node, but now i have the >>> requirement to get also attributes from these nodes. Can anyone help >>> me to change the XPath invocation for my needs. If i try to do it with >>> the node() function at the end, there are more nodes in the output >>> than just with the name() function. I know, that has something to do >>> with empty text nodes and things like that, but i don't know, how to >>> filter them or which function is appropriate for me to get the same >>> nodes as the name() function does, but with the attributes. >> >> >> select="//*[descendant-or-self::*[contains(name(),'to_search')]]/(name(), @*)" >> >> ....will give you the attributes of the elements as well as its name
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Still thinking to object , Jonas Bassl | Thread | RE: [xsl] Still thinking to object , Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Still thinking to object , Jonas Bassl | Date | Re: [xsl] Still thinking to object , David Carlisle |
Month |