Subject: Re: [xsl] Extensions in AltovaXML From: "Colin Adams" <colinpauladams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:25:37 +0000 |
Maybe even more portable than you might at first imagine. I think I could even support those in Gestalt without much effort - emulating the java URI scheme for a few well-known-and-wanted routines. 2008/10/30 Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > My impression from reading it was that many simple calls would be directly > portable, for example > > <xsl:value-of select="math:sin($x)" xmlns:math="java:java.lang.Math"/> > > Michael Kay > http://www.saxonica.com/ > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Florent Georges [mailto:lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: 30 October 2008 12:30 >> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: [xsl] Extensions in AltovaXML >> >> Michael Kay wrote: >> >> > Nice to see also that they have followed conventions which are very >> > close to those used by Saxon, meaning that it should be >> possible (as >> > far as I can see from a quick reading) to write stylesheets >> that use >> > Java or .NET extensions and work with both products. >> >> Unless one has to use product-specific implementation of >> the extension (which is likely to be the case.) Because that >> mechanism involves using the qualified class name directly in >> the stylesheet, without any kind of indirection. >> >> (well, I speak for Java at least) >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> Florent Georges >> http://www.fgeorges.org/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Extensions in AltovaXML, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Extensions in AltovaXML, Florent Georges |
Re: [xsl] XQuery Updates in XSLT, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] Extensions in AltovaXML, Vladimir Nesterovsky |
Month |