Subject: Re: [xsl] Pattern question: first child of first descendant From: "Christian Roth" <roth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:52:00 +0100 |
>But predicates aren't, so how about this: > >entry[ancestor::table][1]/*[self::title or self::para][1] Unfortunately not - it has the same issue as Syd's initial pattern. The first part does a "match all entry elements that have a table ancestor and that are the first child of some element", which again matches all first entry children of all the row elements in the table. -Christian
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Pattern question: first c, Scott Trenda | Thread | RE: [xsl] Pattern question: first c, Scott Trenda |
RE: [xsl] Pattern question: first c, Scott Trenda | Date | RE: [xsl] Pattern question: first c, Scott Trenda |
Month |