Re: [xsl] Pattern question: first child of first descendant

Subject: Re: [xsl] Pattern question: first child of first descendant
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:12:13 GMT

> That's the old // gotcha, where you want to use the descendant axis
> instead...

you may want to do that but you can't in this case (a pattern not an xpath)

David

________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. 
________________________________________________________________________

Current Thread
RE: [xsl] Pattern question: first child of first descendant, (continued) Scott Trenda - 24 Mar 2009 02:30:03 -0000 Message not available Wendell Piez - 24 Mar 2009 14:54:47 -0000 Christian Roth - 24 Mar 2009 01:39:13 -0000 Andrew Welch - 24 Mar 2009 11:08:45 -0000 David Carlisle - 24 Mar 2009 13:12:36 -0000 <= Michael Kay - 24 Mar 2009 08:32:28 -0000 David Carlisle - 24 Mar 2009 09:29:59 -0000 Wendell Piez - 24 Mar 2009 14:57:57 -0000 Message not available Christian Roth - 24 Mar 2009 16:45:42 -0000

Current Thread

RE: [xsl] Pattern question: first child of first descendant, (continued)
- Michael Kay - 24 Mar 2009 08:32:28 -0000
  - David Carlisle - 24 Mar 2009 09:29:59 -0000
  - Wendell Piez - 24 Mar 2009 14:57:57 -0000
  - Message not available
    - Christian Roth - 24 Mar 2009 16:45:42 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Pattern question: first c, Andrew Welch	Thread	RE: [xsl] Pattern question: first c, Michael Kay
Re: [xsl] Pattern question: first c, Andrew Welch	Date	RE: [xsl] Pattern question: first c, Wendell Piez
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home