Subject: Re: [xsl] Numbering new nodes using consecutive integers From: Michael Ludwig <mlu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:07:59 +0100 |
In addition to David's and Ken's suggestions, here's a Gordian knot solution to consider -- is there any reason why this has to be done in a single pass?
The numbering would be trivially easy in a second pass.
In general, I agree that this isn't really a job for xsl:number, whose primary application is to generate numbers relative to the source tree, not the result.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Numbering new nodes using, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [xsl] Numbering new nodes using, G. Ken Holman |
Re: [xsl] Numbering new nodes using, Michael Ludwig | Date | Re: [xsl] Need help combing two ele, Fatbob |
Month |