Re: [xsl] [xslt performance for big xml files]

Subject: Re: [xsl] [xslt performance for big xml files]
From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:53:00 -0700
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Mark Carlson <carlsonm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I have found Saxon to be at least 10 times faster than MSXML and other
> competitors.

Just out of curiosity:

Are your comparisons using the same XSLT code and between an XSLT 1.0
version of Saxon (which version?) and MSXML (which version?), or are
you comparing MSXML to a version of Saxon for XSLT 2?

In the latter case you are probably not using the same code in the
comparison (as MSXML does not support XSLT 2) and are actually
comparing apples to oranges.

In the former case, could you, please, provide the exact code on which
the two XSLT processors were compared and the versions of each

Dimitre Novatchev
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
Never fight an inanimate object
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play

Current Thread