Subject: Re: [xsl] Nicer way to change context-node than xsl:for-each ? From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:47:18 -0500 |
In a template I want to change the context node to the first child. Here's the workaround I've found :
That's not a work-around, that's just the way to do it using the "pull" approach.
This solution is ok, but if something like "xsl:with" or "xsl:context" exists, I'd be glad to know.
Nope ... <xsl:for-each> is what you would use to change context. There shouldn't be multiple ways of doing the same thing (though I agree it is sometimes inevitable, but just because a word doesn't sound right shouldn't warrant the duplication).
-- Vote for your XML training: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/i/ Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/ Training tools: Comprehensive interactive XSLT/XPath 1.0/2.0 video Video lesson: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrNjJCh7Ppg&fmt=18 Video overview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTiodiij6gE&fmt=18 G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/bc Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Nicer way to change context-n, Frédéric Schwebel | Thread | RE: [xsl] Nicer way to change conte, Michael Kay |
[xsl] Nicer way to change context-n, Frédéric Schwebel | Date | RE: [xsl] Nicer way to change conte, Michael Kay |
Month |