Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Namespaces

Subject: Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Namespaces
From: Brandon Ibach <brandon.ibach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:15:02 -0400

Andre,

There are many issues, here, but let's just focus on one, for the
moment.  Can you describe in some more detail the idea of hierarchical
namespaces that you've mentioned a few times, how you think they might
work and what the benefits might be over existing namespace features
and/or alternative solutions?

-Brandon :)

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:42 AM, ac <ac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> than binary, for example, I also proposed enhancing namespace support,
> especially for efficiency and possible hierarchical namespaces.

Current Thread
Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Namespaces, (continued) ac - 20 Apr 2011 18:05:11 -0000 Wendell Piez - 20 Apr 2011 16:15:32 -0000 ac - 20 Apr 2011 18:10:18 -0000 Geert Bormans - 20 Apr 2011 16:16:02 -0000 Brandon Ibach - 20 Apr 2011 18:15:14 -0000 <= Message not available ac - 20 Apr 2011 18:49:51 -0000 Florent Georges - 20 Apr 2011 13:06:30 -0000 Andrew Welch - 18 Apr 2011 08:38:11 -0000 Wendell Piez - 18 Apr 2011 16:13:23 -0000

Current Thread

Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Namespaces, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
[xsl] Another Example [Was: Namespa, Geert Bormans	Thread	Re: [xsl] Another Example [Was: Nam, ac
Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Na, ac	Date	Re: [xsl] Another Example [Was: Nam, ac
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home