|
Subject: [xsl] [XPath 3.0] Why should I bother specifying the "arity" of a function that I invoke? From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 21:06:08 +0000 |
Hi Folks,
The XPath 3.0 specification says that when a named function is invoked you
should specify the number of arguments (i.e., the arity):
NamedFunctionRef ::= EQName "#" IntegerLiteral
Here is an example:
concat#3('Section', ': ', 1)
But this works just as well:
concat('Section', ': ', 1)
So why should I bother specifying the arity? Is there a case where I *must*
specify the arity?
/Roger
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] XSLT 3.0 Working Draft, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] [XPath 3.0] Why should I , Liam R E Quin |
| Re: [xsl] Re: transform html h1 wit, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] [XPath 3.0] Why should I , Liam R E Quin |
| Month |