Subject: [xsl] [XPath 3.0] Why should I bother specifying the "arity" of a function that I invoke? From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 21:06:08 +0000 |
Hi Folks, The XPath 3.0 specification says that when a named function is invoked you should specify the number of arguments (i.e., the arity): NamedFunctionRef ::= EQName "#" IntegerLiteral Here is an example: concat#3('Section', ': ', 1) But this works just as well: concat('Section', ': ', 1) So why should I bother specifying the arity? Is there a case where I *must* specify the arity? /Roger
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 3.0 Working Draft, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] [XPath 3.0] Why should I , Liam R E Quin |
Re: [xsl] Re: transform html h1 wit, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] [XPath 3.0] Why should I , Liam R E Quin |
Month |