Re: [xsl] Only child test

[Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>]

../*[2]

This is the  first expression I thought about -- then saw that
PQQP5Q
P;P0P2 P!P5P4P>P2 has already offered it.

Cheers,
Dimitre

On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Karl Stubsjoen <kstubs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Just curious how other's might approach a test to determine if the
> current node is *not* an only child. This works fine but it feels a
> little heavy to me.  Thoughts?
>
>                 <xsl:if test="(count(preceding-sibling::*) +
> count(following-sibling::*)) &gt; 1">
>                     <hr/>
>                 </xsl:if>
>



--
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
Never fight an inanimate object
-------------------------------------
To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the
biggest mistake of all
------------------------------------
Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play
-------------------------------------
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
-------------------------------------
Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they
write all patents, too? :)
-------------------------------------
I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.