Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl:include From: "Tony Graham" <tgraham@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:19:32 -0000 (GMT) |
On Wed, November 13, 2013 9:28 am, Nic Gibson wrote: > Ive just been asked a question that Im having trouble answering. > The question was could you give me a scenario where xsl:include is a > better choice than xsl:import? I cant think of one right now. Anyone got > a good example? When you don't want import precedence doing its thing, e.g., when the other module works around potential template rule conflicts by using @priority, if you import the other module, then templates in the current module won't play nicely with the finely graduated @priority values in the other module. Regards, Tony Graham tgraham@xxxxxxxxxx Consultant http://www.mentea.net Mentea 13 Kelly's Bay Beach, Skerries, Co. Dublin, Ireland -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- XML, XSL-FO and XSLT consulting, training and programming Chair, Print and Page Layout Community Group @ W3C
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] xsl:include, Nic Gibson | Thread | Re: [xsl] xsl:include, Nic Gibson |
[xsl] xsl:include, Nic Gibson | Date | Re: [xsl] xsl:include, Nic Gibson |
Month |