Subject: Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order? From: davep <davep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 14:10:50 +0000 |
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:48:57 +0000 David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/01/2014 12:01, Michael Kay wrote: > > b) Unlike //head, //text() is "striding" - the nodes it selects are > > non-overlapping (because text nodes never overlap). So absorption > > operations like data(), string(), and <xsl:value-of> are allowed. > > > This is all going to keep this list active for ever:-) > > It remains to be seen I think how far just having a naive mental model > of the kind of things that ought to work in a streaming context will > lead to expressions that are in fact defined to be streaming in the > spec (or are streaming in the implementations). It's an impressive > bit of analysis/specification in any case, I love the terminology:-) I don't David! I do hope it is glossed well - absorbtion operation vb striding! I dread to think what else is coming from 3.0! regards
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] General rule for designin, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] General rule for designin, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] How to avoid adding defau, Ihe Onwuka | Date | Re: [xsl] General rule for designin, Michael Kay |
Month |